<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Feeding The Machine &#187; Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feedingthemachine.com/tag/ubuntu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com</link>
	<description>Gotta keep the fires burning so those gears will keep on turning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 04:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 10.04 Is Lovable Afterall (AKA Second Impressions Are Important Too)</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-is-lovable-afterall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-is-lovable-afterall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve continued to use the 10.04 Beta 2 installation over the weekend, and I&#8217;m finding a lot to like about the soon-to-be-official LTS release of Ubuntu after I fixed the titlebar button problem I ran into the other day. I still say that was a very bad call, and I hope they reverse it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve continued to use the 10.04 Beta 2 installation over the weekend, and I&#8217;m finding a lot to like about the soon-to-be-official LTS release of Ubuntu after I fixed the titlebar button problem I ran into the other day. I still say that was a very bad call, and I hope they reverse it at the 11th hour, because it will do nothing but bad things.</p>
<p>To fix it, enter the following into a command prompt:</p>
<blockquote><p>gconftool-2 &#8211;set &#8216;/apps/metacity/general/button_layout&#8217; &#8211;type string &#8220;menu:minimize,maximize,close&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>(Note you may have to fix some of the quotes, since the typographical quotes don&#8217;t work like &#8220;real&#8221; quotes in the shell)</p>
<p>An viola, sane titlebar button placement for your user account. I&#8217;m planning on building a little app in Quickly to do this push-button style. If / when I finish that I&#8217;ll put it in a PPA and post about it here. It will be of limited utility, but a good way to play with Quickly and setting up  a PPA. Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>The improved boot speed is FANTASTIC. I haven&#8217;t actually timed it, but on this laptop it feels as fast or faster than resuming from a suspend, which I think is pretty impressive.</p>
<p>The visual tweaks are good (modulo titlebar idocy&#8230;) and I love the &#8220;Ambiance&#8221; GTK theme. I tend to like darker themes, and this is probably one of the best ones I&#8217;ve used.</p>
<p>Of course the version bumps in major apps is nice, and being able to run the latest firefox w/o repo jiggery pokery is convenient. My webcam is also working out of the box, a first on this hardware, and is even working in Flash. Chatroulette here I come! On the downside, I am getting playback hiccup in full-screened videos from Hulu, which I never got before. Hulu has apparently made some changes recently that makes it not work at all w/ 64-bit Linux, so maybe it&#8217;s related to that.</p>
<p>So, long story short-ish,I think this will be a solid release. I have my doubts as to whether or not it will meet expectations as an LTS release given the fairly large amount of very visisble tinkering that has apparently gone on, but overall I&#8217;m looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-is-lovable-afterall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 9.04: A Few Weeks In</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/05/ubuntu-9-04-a-few-weeks-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/05/ubuntu-9-04-a-few-weeks-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I&#8217;m generally real happy with Jaunty. It&#8217;s fast (well, except for the Intel driver regressions, but only one of my machines is affected, and the speed hit doesn&#8217;t really matter on that one), Pidgin doesn&#8217;t randomly start leaking memory and crash, and I totally dig the new logout/status applet deal. Very nice. I even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;m generally real happy with Jaunty. It&#8217;s fast (well, except for the Intel driver regressions, but only one of my machines is affected, and the speed hit doesn&#8217;t really matter on that one), Pidgin doesn&#8217;t randomly start leaking memory and crash, and I totally dig the new logout/status applet deal. Very nice. I even like the new notification system. It&#8217;s clearly not fully baked, but it&#8217;s a good direction. I really <span style="font-style: italic;">don&#8217;t</span> like the new indicator applet however. It looks like a little envelope, and if I have any sort of communication event a little green dot appears on it. The idea is that there is one indicator for a number of events, but now I can&#8217;t just look at it and instantly know which application had an event and know where to go, I have to click on it and open the even list to know what I need to give attention to, or just shuffle through my apps to see what&#8217;s up. This is a major regression in usability! On top of that, because it looks the same regardless of the event that has occurred, I can&#8217;t tell if something <span style="font-style: italic;">actually</span> needs attention or not.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m generally happy with the direction things have gone in 9.04, but they really need to make sure that this stuff is fully baked in the next release and these usability regressions are fixed, or they&#8217;re going to really alienate a lot of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/05/ubuntu-9-04-a-few-weeks-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too&#8230;Long&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/04/too-long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/04/too-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eek, over a month since my last meaningful post? geez&#8230; Had a good weekend. Spent most of it pottering around at home. Graham and I finally put in the time to get our home network into a decent state, which meant getting the home router / server / thing (known as Zinn) all setup. Well, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eek, over a month since my last meaningful post? geez&#8230;</p>
<p>Had a good weekend. Spent most of it pottering around at home. Graham and I finally put in the time to get our home network into a decent state, which meant getting the home router / server / thing (known as Zinn)  all setup. Well, it turns out that the motherboard we were going to use was in a questionable state. Questionable meaning that although it seemed to work, every single capacitor of a particular size on it had vented, a couple rather explosively. So, Zinn currently lives in Liz&#8217;s old desktop (actually a low-end server, but I digress&#8230;) until the parts we ordered today arrive. When all is said and done we will have one box hooking up to our DSL, running our private and public wireless, terminating our VPNs, and routing all the traffic amongst them. I&#8217;m expecting the power consumption on it to be somewhere around 50 watts. Not bad, if I say so myself. I guesstimate that our current consumption is around 120 or so, so this is a significant drop.</p>
<p>Gr also got a pretty bad-ass net-boot setup running on Zinn, so we can do netboot installs of Hardy and also run a number of diagnotics. It will be especially nice once our local Hardy mirror is complete. We&#8217;ll be able to do completely current installs at Gb speed. It&#8217;s pretty cool if you&#8217;re into that sort of thing.</p>
<p>I also got a random &#8220;Thank You&#8221; email from someone out on the Internet who found my <a href="http://www.socialtext.net/open/index.cgi?socialtext_open_install_guide_for_ubuntu_6_06">Socialtext installation guide</a> useful. That&#8217;s nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/04/too-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What have you done Mozilla?</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/what-have-you-done-mozilla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/what-have-you-done-mozilla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epiphany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, today I was using Firefox 2.0.0.12 on my Ubuntu machine accessing my usual array of webpages, including gmail and Google Reader. I noticed that my whole machine was feeling really, really slow. Turns out Firefox was really hammering my processors (yes, plural&#8230;), presumably thanks to the Javascript-y stuff on gmail and reader since the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, today I was using Firefox 2.0.0.12 on my Ubuntu machine accessing my usual array of webpages, including gmail and Google Reader. I noticed that my whole machine was feeling really, really slow. Turns out Firefox was really hammering my processors (yes, plural&#8230;), presumably thanks to the Javascript-y stuff on gmail and reader since the problem subsided when I closed those pages, even though it didn&#8217;t go away completely. Now, I&#8217;ve seen Firefox get pretty sluggish if left open too long before thanks to its&#8217; many memory leaks, but never this bad. It got to the point that it was pretty unusable.</p>
<p>So, I decided to install Epiphany, the default Gnome web browser. Now, I&#8217;ve used Epiphany before and it had some pretty big rendering problems. So far today, no problems at all. And you know what? It feels substantially faster, a <span style="font-style: italic;">lot</span> faster than Firefox. And the Javascript stuff on gmail and reader isn&#8217;t hammering my machine into oblivion.</p>
<p>Will I stop using Firefox? Probably not, there are a lot of extensions for it that I find pretty integral to my work, like the Web Author add-on and Firebug and a few others that slip my mind at the moment. I will, however, probably start using Epiphany for my normal browsing needs if it continues to perform well and Firefox continues to perform so poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/what-have-you-done-mozilla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubunteros!</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/01/ubunteros/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/01/ubunteros/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[moto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friday night I went through the steps required to become an &#8220;Ubuntero&#8221;. This basically just means that I have agreed to and signed the Community Code of Conduct. One more step along to the road to MOTU completed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friday night I went through the steps required to become an &#8220;Ubuntero&#8221;. This basically just means that I have agreed to and signed the <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct">Community Code of Conduct</a>. One more step along to the road to MOTU completed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/01/ubunteros/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is telling.</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/08/this-is-telling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/08/this-is-telling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gnome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this blog post, a (presumably) recent Ubuntu convert talks about the reasons they switched. The number one reason is the eye candy. That is noteworthy. OSS developers have recently begun to realize that looking nice is important, and started making strides in that area. This statement validates that focus and confirms that users actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://techplunder.blogspot.com/2007/08/10-advantages-of-ubuntu-over-vista.html">this blog post</a>, a (presumably) recent Ubuntu convert talks about the reasons they switched. The number one reason is the eye candy. That is noteworthy. OSS developers have recently begun to realize that looking nice is important, and started making strides in that area. This statement validates that focus and confirms that users actually care about the bling. Keep it up!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/08/this-is-telling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
