<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Feeding The Machine &#187; Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feedingthemachine.com/tag/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com</link>
	<description>Gotta keep the fires burning so those gears will keep on turning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 04:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 10.04 Is Lovable Afterall (AKA Second Impressions Are Important Too)</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-is-lovable-afterall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-is-lovable-afterall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve continued to use the 10.04 Beta 2 installation over the weekend, and I&#8217;m finding a lot to like about the soon-to-be-official LTS release of Ubuntu after I fixed the titlebar button problem I ran into the other day. I still say that was a very bad call, and I hope they reverse it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve continued to use the 10.04 Beta 2 installation over the weekend, and I&#8217;m finding a lot to like about the soon-to-be-official LTS release of Ubuntu after I fixed the titlebar button problem I ran into the other day. I still say that was a very bad call, and I hope they reverse it at the 11th hour, because it will do nothing but bad things.</p>
<p>To fix it, enter the following into a command prompt:</p>
<blockquote><p>gconftool-2 &#8211;set &#8216;/apps/metacity/general/button_layout&#8217; &#8211;type string &#8220;menu:minimize,maximize,close&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>(Note you may have to fix some of the quotes, since the typographical quotes don&#8217;t work like &#8220;real&#8221; quotes in the shell)</p>
<p>An viola, sane titlebar button placement for your user account. I&#8217;m planning on building a little app in Quickly to do this push-button style. If / when I finish that I&#8217;ll put it in a PPA and post about it here. It will be of limited utility, but a good way to play with Quickly and setting up  a PPA. Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>The improved boot speed is FANTASTIC. I haven&#8217;t actually timed it, but on this laptop it feels as fast or faster than resuming from a suspend, which I think is pretty impressive.</p>
<p>The visual tweaks are good (modulo titlebar idocy&#8230;) and I love the &#8220;Ambiance&#8221; GTK theme. I tend to like darker themes, and this is probably one of the best ones I&#8217;ve used.</p>
<p>Of course the version bumps in major apps is nice, and being able to run the latest firefox w/o repo jiggery pokery is convenient. My webcam is also working out of the box, a first on this hardware, and is even working in Flash. Chatroulette here I come! On the downside, I am getting playback hiccup in full-screened videos from Hulu, which I never got before. Hulu has apparently made some changes recently that makes it not work at all w/ 64-bit Linux, so maybe it&#8217;s related to that.</p>
<p>So, long story short-ish,I think this will be a solid release. I have my doubts as to whether or not it will meet expectations as an LTS release given the fairly large amount of very visisble tinkering that has apparently gone on, but overall I&#8217;m looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-is-lovable-afterall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 10.04 First Impressions: From Annoyed to Incredulous</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-first-impressions-from-annoyed-to-incredulous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-first-impressions-from-annoyed-to-incredulous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So&#8230;. Ubuntu 10.04 is right around the corner. Awesome, right? Well, they&#8217;ve made a number of changes which I&#8217;m less than excited about. One of them being moving the titlebar buttons from the top-right of the window (where they have been for ages) to the top-left. When this hit the news, it kinda bugged me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;. Ubuntu 10.04 is right around the corner. Awesome, right? Well, they&#8217;ve made a number of changes which I&#8217;m less than excited about. One of them being moving the titlebar buttons from the top-right of the window (where they have been for ages) to the top-left. When this hit the news, it kinda bugged me on principle because it seemed like a &#8220;change for the sake of change&#8221; sort of thing. But I brushed it off and more or less forgot about it until tonight. You see, Beta 2 of 10.04 was released this week, and as is my custom I upgraded my &#8220;I like it to be stable, but it doesn&#8217;t really matter a lot if it breaks&#8221; laptop to see how things have been coming along since I last looked at the first alpha. Almost immediately I ran into this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.feedingthemachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Screenshot.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-266" title="Screenshot" src="http://www.feedingthemachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Screenshot.png" alt="" width="51" height="100" /></a></p>
<p>Can you tell me what&#8217;s wrong with this picture?</p>
<p>No?</p>
<p>Well, the problem with this picture is that fewer than a dozen pixels makes difference between clicking on &#8220;File&#8221; and clicking on &#8220;Close&#8221;. Perhaps even worse, less than 6 pixels mean the difference between hitting the main application launch button and clicking &#8220;Close&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is STUPID. This is going to piss off TONS of people. I&#8217;m a 15-year IT veteran and within 30 minutes of using this setup I accidentally clicked on the close button twice. What is the &#8220;normal desktop user&#8221; that Ubuntu supposedly targets going to do?</p>
<p>Ugh&#8230; seriously guys, it&#8217;s called Fitt&#8217;s Law. Look it up. It&#8217;s why things like this are BAD IDEA. If you are going to be making changes like this DO SOME FRIGGING USABILITY STUDIES.</p>
<p>I really meant to do a more thorough post on 10.04, but I have to go de-pressurize my brain after actually seeing this first-hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2010/04/ubuntu-10-04-first-impressions-from-annoyed-to-incredulous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Split Screen Screen</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/04/split-screen-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/04/split-screen-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysadmin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I&#8217;ve used screen for years when connecting to remote servers. It&#8217;s great for having multiple &#8220;virtual terminals&#8221; running on one server and also for making sure long running processes don&#8217;t die if you get disconnected for some reason. Today, I wanted to watch the progress of a long-running process (a backup) at the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;ve used screen for years when connecting to remote servers. It&#8217;s great for having multiple &#8220;virtual terminals&#8221; running on one server and also for making sure long running processes don&#8217;t die if you get disconnected for some reason.</p>
<p>Today, I wanted to watch the progress of a long-running process (a backup) at the same time as I watched htop and slurm to keep an eye on performance values while it was running. My first thought was to figure out how to make screen cycle through different sessions automatically, every X seconds, like how many KVMs behave. Turns out there&#8217;s an even better solution. You can make screen operate split screen, so you can see multiple sessions all at once! Why oh why didn&#8217;t I take the time to discover this sooner?</p>
<ol>
<li>Start screen.</li>
<li>Hit ctrl-a/shift-s to split the screen.</li>
<li>Hit ctrl-a/tab to switch to the other &#8220;screen&#8221;.</li>
<li>Hit ctrl-a/c to create a new session or ctrl-a/(screen #)<number> to switch to an already running session.</number></li>
<li>Hit ctrl-a/shift-s to split the &#8220;screen&#8221; again if you like.</li>
</ol>
<p>So this is what my screen session looks like now:<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_crweDTyn1eU/SfH9L1YnYGI/AAAAAAAAACI/RqgOtHVppKA/s1600-h/splitscreen.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 211px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_crweDTyn1eU/SfH9L1YnYGI/AAAAAAAAACI/RqgOtHVppKA/s320/splitscreen.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5328318213906718818" border="0" /></a><br />All the stuff I wanted to keep an eye visible at once. Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/04/split-screen-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stupid bash tricks</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/03/stupid-bash-tricks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/03/stupid-bash-tricks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerdiness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I had to rename a server today. I could go through all the config files that reference the name by hand and change it. I could use grep to find them all easily and then change them by hand. Or I could use grep and sed wrapped in a bash one-liner and have it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I had to rename a server today. I could go through all the config files that reference the name by hand and change it. I could use grep to find them all easily and then change them by hand. Or I could use grep and sed wrapped in a bash one-liner and have it all done for me. Like so:<br />
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> for i in `grep -lir oldname *`; do sed s/oldname/newname/ $i > $i.new; mv $i.new $i;done</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s things like this that make working with Linux such a joy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/03/stupid-bash-tricks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia / PhysX purchase suddenly makes sense</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/nvidia-physx-purchase-suddenly-makes-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/nvidia-physx-purchase-suddenly-makes-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the bit of information divulged here, Nvidia&#8217;s purchase of PhysX suddenly makes sense. I wonder if the PhysX -> CUDA port will work on Linux? Here&#8217;s hoping&#8230;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the bit of information divulged <a href="http://techreport.com/discussions.x/14147">here</a>, Nvidia&#8217;s purchase of PhysX suddenly makes sense. I wonder if the PhysX -> CUDA port will work on Linux? Here&#8217;s hoping&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/nvidia-physx-purchase-suddenly-makes-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What have you done Mozilla?</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/what-have-you-done-mozilla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/what-have-you-done-mozilla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epiphany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, today I was using Firefox 2.0.0.12 on my Ubuntu machine accessing my usual array of webpages, including gmail and Google Reader. I noticed that my whole machine was feeling really, really slow. Turns out Firefox was really hammering my processors (yes, plural&#8230;), presumably thanks to the Javascript-y stuff on gmail and reader since the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, today I was using Firefox 2.0.0.12 on my Ubuntu machine accessing my usual array of webpages, including gmail and Google Reader. I noticed that my whole machine was feeling really, really slow. Turns out Firefox was really hammering my processors (yes, plural&#8230;), presumably thanks to the Javascript-y stuff on gmail and reader since the problem subsided when I closed those pages, even though it didn&#8217;t go away completely. Now, I&#8217;ve seen Firefox get pretty sluggish if left open too long before thanks to its&#8217; many memory leaks, but never this bad. It got to the point that it was pretty unusable.</p>
<p>So, I decided to install Epiphany, the default Gnome web browser. Now, I&#8217;ve used Epiphany before and it had some pretty big rendering problems. So far today, no problems at all. And you know what? It feels substantially faster, a <span style="font-style: italic;">lot</span> faster than Firefox. And the Javascript stuff on gmail and reader isn&#8217;t hammering my machine into oblivion.</p>
<p>Will I stop using Firefox? Probably not, there are a lot of extensions for it that I find pretty integral to my work, like the Web Author add-on and Firebug and a few others that slip my mind at the moment. I will, however, probably start using Epiphany for my normal browsing needs if it continues to perform well and Firefox continues to perform so poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/02/what-have-you-done-mozilla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freaking Brilliant</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/01/freaking-brilliant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/01/freaking-brilliant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the spirit of MLK Jr day in the US, Joey Stanford wrote a rather brilliant piece on the part that Free Software can play in forwarding the social good. Good job Joey. I particularly liked this quote he referenced from Martin Luther King Jr: “Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the spirit of MLK Jr day in the US, Joey Stanford wrote a rather <a href="http://joey.ubuntu-rocks.org/blog/2008/01/21/a-day-of-freedom/">brilliant piece</a> on the part that Free Software can play in forwarding the social good. Good job Joey. I particularly liked this quote he referenced from Martin Luther King Jr:</p>
<p>“<strong>Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle. And so we must straighten our backs and work for our freedom. A man can’t ride you unless your back is bent.”</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Awesome. I&#8217;ve often wished I had been alive to see or hear MLK Jr speak.</span><br /></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2008/01/freaking-brilliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We were inverted</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/09/we-were-inverted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/09/we-were-inverted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This somewhat tongue in cheek look at &#8220;making the switch&#8221; from *nix to Windows is good for a laugh. Mostly because his sentiments largely echo my own. I&#8217;m having a bad Windows day. It seems like everything I try to do is getting hindered by some stupid Windows quirk. It&#8217;s like the damn thing is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://madpenguin.org/cms/html/47/5937.html">This</a> somewhat tongue in cheek look at &#8220;making the switch&#8221; from *nix to Windows is good for a laugh. Mostly because his sentiments largely echo my own.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a bad Windows day. It seems like everything I try to do is getting hindered by some stupid Windows quirk. It&#8217;s like the damn thing is just an accumulation of work-arounds for poor design choices that were made 15 years ago. Nobody in the Windows world ever seems to really fix problems at their root, it&#8217;s always some sort of hackish lame-ass dodge that invariably introduces some obnoxious unintended consequence. I have to believe this is due to sales / marketing induced time-line / legacy pressure. The alternative, that they aren&#8217;t smart enough to realize what they are doing is lame, would just do too much damage to my already shaky faith in humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/09/we-were-inverted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hell Hath Frozen Over</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/09/hell-hath-frozen-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/09/hell-hath-frozen-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD just promised to release chip specs and a minimal reference driver to the OSS community for all their products from R500 forward so that the community can create good drivers for them. Big kudos to to AMD for this move. This is huge, and I seriously had my doubts about it happening. The best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/248227/">just promised</a> to release chip specs and a minimal reference driver to the OSS community for all their products from R500 forward so that the community can create good drivers for them. Big kudos to to AMD for this move. This is huge, and I seriously had my doubts about it happening. The best part about this is that Nvidia is now the odd man out amongst the top three video chip producers with closed hardware and/or (fully functional) drivers. One hopes they will decide to join the party soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/09/hell-hath-frozen-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is telling.</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/08/this-is-telling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/08/this-is-telling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gnome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this blog post, a (presumably) recent Ubuntu convert talks about the reasons they switched. The number one reason is the eye candy. That is noteworthy. OSS developers have recently begun to realize that looking nice is important, and started making strides in that area. This statement validates that focus and confirms that users actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://techplunder.blogspot.com/2007/08/10-advantages-of-ubuntu-over-vista.html">this blog post</a>, a (presumably) recent Ubuntu convert talks about the reasons they switched. The number one reason is the eye candy. That is noteworthy. OSS developers have recently begun to realize that looking nice is important, and started making strides in that area. This statement validates that focus and confirms that users actually care about the bling. Keep it up!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2007/08/this-is-telling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
