<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Feeding The Machine &#187; Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feedingthemachine.com/tag/fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com</link>
	<description>Gotta keep the fires burning so those gears will keep on turning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dear ABC</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/06/dear-abc/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dear-abc</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/06/dear-abc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The user experience of watching shows on your website sucks. Even on supported platforms, having to click through the ads is a pain. Why not let Hulu do it for you? They&#8217;re better at it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The user experience of watching shows on your website sucks. Even on supported platforms, having to click through the ads is a pain. Why not let Hulu do it for you? They&#8217;re better at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/06/dear-abc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirate Bay Defendants Found Guilty. Will You Be Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/04/pirate-bay-defendants-found-guilty-will-you-be-next/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pirate-bay-defendants-found-guilty-will-you-be-next</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/04/pirate-bay-defendants-found-guilty-will-you-be-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, this just hacks me off. As is being reported all over this morning, the Pirate Bay trial in Sweden has concluded with unanimous guilty verdicts. See here and here, for a good summary and some brief analysis. I have two fundamental problems with this. The first is that this ruling flies in the face [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this just hacks me off. As is being reported all over this morning, the Pirate Bay trial in Sweden has concluded with unanimous guilty verdicts. See <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-trial-the-verdict-090417/">here</a> and <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090417/0129274535.shtml">here</a>, for a good summary and some brief analysis.</p>
<p>I have two fundamental problems with this. The first is that this ruling flies in the face of &#8220;safe harbor&#8221; concepts that most law contains (including Swedish law, as I understand it) and these men are being prosecuted for providing to what amounts to a search engine, they did not host any of this &#8220;illegal&#8221; content in the first place. It&#8217;s a short trip down a slippery slope to lawsuits against ISPs for providing the bandwidth that allowed the download to happen and against the companies that provided the software that encoded to media that made the files small enough that moving them became practical. It&#8217;s the same reason I&#8217;m against outlawing guns. Outlawing something, particularly something useful, because it can be used to cause harm is stupid. It only punishes people who want to obey the law, and has no impact whatsoever on people who would be using those tools for doing something that was <span style="font-style: italic;">already illegal</span>. What&#8217;s next? Outlawing hatchets because you <span style="font-style: italic;">can</span> murder someone with them? Outlawing telescopes because you <span style="font-style: italic;">can</span> peep on someone with them? If someone wants to do those things, they will find a way to acquire the tools they need to get it done, via legal means or not.</p>
<p>The second problem I have with this is that the &#8220;illegalness&#8221; of the content they &#8220;provided access to&#8221; is debatable. It arguably falls under a &#8220;fair use&#8221; -like umbrella, <span style="font-style: italic;">particularly</span> according to Swedish law. Again, that is only if I understand it correctly, but it&#8217;s totally possible I&#8217;m wrong. And the &#8220;damages&#8221; are completely imaginary, predicated on the assumption that &#8220;unauthorized downloads = lost sales&#8221;, which they don&#8217;t. The whole thing just smacks of the judge either getting paid off or buckling under political pressure.</p>
<p>In the end, it&#8217;s just more collateral damage as the behemoth that is old media goes through it&#8217;s death throes. Your back is broken, you no longer control distribution. You don&#8217;t get to have all the eggs in your basket anymore. Since you refuse to evolve, just fucking die already. Content is effectively free now, and no number of legal &#8220;victories&#8221; will change that. Quit treating your customers like criminals and give them a reason to pay you, and you might still survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/04/pirate-bay-defendants-found-guilty-will-you-be-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Basackwards</title>
		<link>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/01/basackwards/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=basackwards</link>
		<comments>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/01/basackwards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>q</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feedingthemachine.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is it that when setting up Vista creating a password for your account is optional, but if you create a password, entering some sort of password hint is required? Someone needs to get their priorities re-arranged&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that when setting up Vista creating a password for your account is optional, but if you create a password, entering some sort of password hint is required? Someone needs to get their priorities re-arranged&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.feedingthemachine.com/2009/01/basackwards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

